tom moody

Archive for April, 2011

title unknown ("b")

1304082527395-dumpfm-82times-b

animated GIF by 82times

82times has some programming chops and makes many of his GIFs with command line software, from what I've observed/overheard on dump. Not sure how this one was done but it looks like someone else's image(s) were significantly reduced. The suggestion of a photo-negative plate and badly-scrubbed data intrigues; at the same time there is a fair amount of information and movement here for a mere 41 KB GIF. And that greyed down mauve is to die for, as they say. Unlike many artists with tech savvy, 82times does not put out a press release with every image announcing his mad skillz. His understatement and willingness to play around, try things out, and change tone and style is much appreciated.

- tom moody

April 30th, 2011 at 11:41 pm

Posted in animation - others

"Data for Trinkets"

"Data for Trinkets" [2.9 MB .mp3]

Am finally starting to write my own patches for the Sidstation synth, a piece of gear based on the Commodore PC sound chip from the '80s. The rhythm is an analog kick coming into the Sid's external audio port, treated by a filter with two or three LFOs working on it, pulling it slightly in and out of tune (and step). The main melody is three oscillators tuned to make a chord, also with filtering and LFOs (I don't remember if the latter are working independently or on all three OSCs--in any case they are synced to the beat and not individual notes, producing a kind of wonky warble on sustained notes). The percussion is also all Sid--one factory patch and two of mine. Very noisy background, that's what one of the "charms" of the chip, as the manufacturers say.

- tom moody

April 30th, 2011 at 6:19 pm

Posted in music - tm

"Modular Medley (Part 1 Only)"

"Modular Medley (Part 1 Only)" [4.5 MB .mp3]

Decided to post this two minute song as a stand-alone piece. Repeating what I wrote about it earlier:

Am continuing to explore using MIDI to control the Mutator filter (my one piece of vintage '90s gear).
About forty seconds into [this] you can hear mirror image patterns written in the pitchbend controller grids of Cubase--one pattern for the left channel and one for the right, so there is an antiphonal effect. The sequences are "carving" pitch information out of a sustained synth note played into the filter's external audio input (and split by the filter into stereo channels). Pitched down an octave it reminds me of the eerie tuned drum bass note Goblin uses on the Suspiria soundtrack--it's instantly recognizable if you know the movie.

The intro and ending are done with the Modular-Mini 2 Reaktor instrument.

- tom moody

April 30th, 2011 at 6:18 pm

Posted in music - tm

interactivity online and off

This is a snippet from a longer comment by Sally McKay, hopefully it's OK to take out of context:

Something I like about so-called remix culture is that participants are artists & viewers at the same time, so the artworld hierarchies and power structures carry way less weight. Unlike relational aesthetics projects in art galleries — where the participants basically just provide the anonymous person-power to manifest the famous artist's idea — GIFs exist in a culture with different stakes, where authorship is not always an important contextual feature. Sometimes authorship is important, especially when GIF artists build up an oeuvre, and that's cool too. Because the same GIF can live in multiple online contexts (forums, blogs, artists' archival pages, etc), the whole practice is nice and fluid.

m.river, responding to another aspect of McKay's comment (that his work was "techno-utopian"--read the whole thread), says that, in making a particular artwork in the late '90s, he had an "...interest in the ability for people to exchange/ share/ modify/ delete an artwork within a network environment. It was a way to say that an internet, or any digital artwork for that matter, could be an active rather than passive object. It was, and is, about a relation of active viewers and active artist."

In an email, Michael Manning says that he doesn't necessarily agree with

the argument that in 1997 networked art really worked in a remix culture fashion. Perhaps images were transferred and could be modified, however most classic net.art is pretty passive in the sense [that] although you may be interacting with the site or work (say Shulgin's 'Form Art'), the user isn't really creating anything as they experience it and if they are, the terms of that creation are dictated by the original artist instead of you posting a GIF to dump then me saving it and doing whatever I want with it. I guess some of the BBSs and some of Bunting's stuff had participation, but it was still under the guise of some type of pre-decided control put in place by the artist, again not really collapsing producer/viewer all that much. Almost like web based version of gallery relational aesthetics.

- tom moody

April 30th, 2011 at 4:35 pm

Posted in general

GIF appeal hashed out

After much shouting and name-calling (mostly with me on the receiving end, sorry to say), Will Brand has revised this statement:

The preference for GIF as a medium, it seems to me, has nothing to do whatsoever with its compression algorithms, a teensy bit to do with the retro appeal of a limited color palette, and a whole lot to do with the fact that - as the very existence of your remix culture indicates - it's so easily interchanged.

He now understands that many artists prefer GIFs for their funky compression algorithms (what John Michael Boling called "the elegance in an appropriately used dither"), the minimal, de stijl-like appeal of a limited color palette (whether or not it is retro), and somewhere further down the list, ease of remixing (since, after all, the first attempts at "art" GIFs existed long before a SocMed "remix culture").

It was rough, but I finally got him to publicly agree with me.

Update, July 2011:
This is an ironic post. I don't think I would ever say that someone "publicly agrees with me"--it has a bit too much of a "smell the glove" ring to it. Nor does WB actually agree with me--he still maintains that interchange trumps graphics in the GIF acronym. Was just inverting his words out of annoyance with the linked-to post.

- tom moody

April 29th, 2011 at 10:24 am

Posted in general

people on catwalk look at hoarder's collection

karsten_bott

It's actually an artwork, One of Each, 1993, by Karsten Bott, as seen on Vvork. This work came to NY (PS1) in the '90s in a show called "Deep Storage." At the time of the exhibit the concept of "hoarders" wasn't in common parlance but the show featured pieces such as Warhol's time capsules (unsealed somewhat prematurely), racks of library catalog file cards, On Kawara date records in ledgers, and other obsession-compulsion-as-art projects.

I couldn't name anything in Bott's collection of crap today but I remember a lot of it was old, faded and depressing. "Deep Storage" was fairly convincing about the tragedy of making, preserving, and warehousing "stuff" as an inherent flaw in gallery-style art since Duchamp. How long are you going to pay for your storage unit of found objects? There is an invisible economy in the art world based on delusion and hope, where everything eventually ends up either in permanent storage in a museum or back in the landfill.

- tom moody

April 29th, 2011 at 8:56 am

Posted in art - others

more post-GIF posturing

your_cinemagraph_tribe

Pixel-art-movie-directors-6

See: Paddy Johnson on Hair GIFs.

Illustration from Very Important Pixels

- tom moody

April 28th, 2011 at 5:07 pm

Will Brand Publicly Agrees With Me

Will has changed his mind about whether the mix is more important than the motion in the strange saga of animated GIFs as artistic expression. He now agrees that "The Art Happens Here" graphic from 1997 (indicating the network space among computers as the locus for "the art") has dated badly and probably shouldn't be used to symbolize the rather more sophisticated things people are doing with GIFs these days (and no, we're not talking about cinemagraphs).

Oh, whoops, I don't think he said any of that--so why is he saying I'm publicly agreeing with him?

- tom moody

April 28th, 2011 at 5:06 pm

Posted in general

hypermolecular symmetry 2

rotor34_3_symm2crop

GIF made with screen captures from the Rotor 34 - HyperMolecules page

- tom moody

April 28th, 2011 at 11:10 am

random tweets from 2009

...from my twitter archive in HTML (manually updated every six months or so):

"in the future everyone will be famous for fifteen people" - momus 4:08 PM Dec 21st, 2009

wouldn't know shitake from shinola 9:29 PM Dec 16th, 2009

"Lovecraft is like totally bananas hahaha I mean wow. This one hell it was just strait up nuts, freaky low quality goodness hahaha." 1:45 AM Dec 10th, 2009

both neko case and mark mothersbaugh picked "A Face in the Crowd" for TCM 12:32 AM Dec 9th, 2009

headline from comcast web portal: "Authorities say man stabbed 2 Army buddies to death" (can a murder victim still be a buddy?) 5:56 PM Dec 4th, 2009

track 10 on Tony Thorpe's Electric Kingdom electro comp. is Lory D, Bitter End 1, not Synapse (discogs notes the error on the CD) 1:04 AM Dec 4th, 2009

3 books on the way: Paglia's The Birds, Ethan Frome, and the first Earthsea novel (never read those Le Guins) 12:24 AM Dec 4th, 2009

reading Richard Ford's 3rd Bascombe book - I kind of hate it but the obsessive detail makes it hard to ignore 12:19 AM Dec 4th, 2009

"this book is bad" "well, you're bad" (criticism in the happy talk days of 2009) 7:38 PM Dec 3rd, 2009

the search function here is so lousy I'm saving my twits to a private blog page (these are supposed to be notes I can use) 10:15 AM Dec 3rd, 2009

sliced actual '70s breakbeat 10:12 AM Dec 3rd, 2009

- tom moody

April 28th, 2011 at 11:10 am

Posted in general