Guyton, Ruff: Abject Cyberculture With Cash

guyton

Two examples of "abject cyberculture" on view in large Chelsea galleries: Wade Guyton's "black paintings" a la Stella or Reinhart made with industrial-sized EPSON printers with clogged print heads (at Friedrich Petzel) and Thomas Ruff's gigantic "bad jpeg" photos of idyllic landscapes and manmade disasters, where "bicubic mush" resulting from saving images too many times creates a zillion Mondrians when viewed up close (at David Zwirner). Both shows shined and one wishes these dealers the best marketing this type of work to a collector class that values the "human hand" over everything.

It has to be said, though, that the copious cash necessary to produce both exhibits somewhat negates their would-be Arte Povera aesthetic. In addition to the untold EPSON cartridges expended on Guyton's show (the gallery put an image of the ink containers on the exhibition mailer in a "truth to materials" gesture), the artist carpeted the entire floor of the oversized warehouse space in wall-to-wall cheap plywood, painted austere, semi-glossy black. It's hard to convey without seeing it how much wood this is, but it's a decent sized shantytown or Broadway set's worth, at least. Concentrating on the paintings is difficult because you're constantly thinking about what's underfoot--an arbitrary, temporary surface trying too hard to "neutralize the white cube." It can't be done at Petzel, sorry.

Similarly, one does not want to contemplate the printing bill for the Ruff show--25 or 30 museum scale photos, flawlessly rendered and framed, their purpose to bowl you over with the sheer craft and tastefulness of their production so that you don't even remember that the subject is consumer technology (Photoshop) that anyone could mess with.

Quote of the Day

[Emily] Gould, who has been with Gawker for a year, said she was upset about a new compensation system that pays writers according to how many times people view their blog posts rather than only by how many posts they write. The system, she said, pits writers against one another.

"It really gets in your head in this weird way because you're getting so conscious of how many people are reading what," Ms. Gould said. "You get focused on being sensational and even more brain candyish than Gawker was to start with."

from "Top Editor and Two Colleagues to Leave Media Blog Gawker," from the (pro-war) New York Times via Paddy Johnson

Yes, death to brain candy. More obscure musings on esoteric subjects, there are plenty of blogs out there trolling for hits now. What's needed is more electronic music journalism and extremely long passages from de Quincey.

Bewersdorf And/Or Lonergan

Kevin Bewersdorf and Guthrie Lonergan at And/Or Gallery in Dallas: Installation shots. Pathos to go, including the immortal Domain, the Adorno-championed 2001 [counterdirectional arrows] 2006, Google image search results for “pain” printed onto mouse pads by Walgreens.com, a commemorative obelisk probably also available online, and the memorialized "Hacking vs Defaults" table, which is "art about the art world" not worthy of condemnation due to the obscure, niche position of the art world in question (Net Art ?.0) and generous nod to a certain exuberantly humble, one might even say unmonumental blog.