general

JL emailed:

Kind of neat link about a color picker in an ipad app, and the research that went into emulating color mixing in software..
I like seeing their non-consumer-facing prototypes, the sort of thing professional designers derisively term "programmer art." Otherwise it's just another narrative of "devs getting it right," finally finding a use for this weird vector math from the 1930s.
A flat, mottled "watercolor" look is the end result. Haven't used the app. Maybe if you hold down your finger, it emulates paint seeping into flat off-white paper. One shot showcases the effect of scribbling a note to yourself in pencil, and then redoing the strokes in pen. It will probably take another year before they capture the voluptuous joy of watching ink dry.
The article itself is criticized in the comments: "You're comparing additive and substractive color models, intellectually dishonest."

I don't really get this article/practice/worldview at all.
I use a color picker and if the color looks crappy, I can put another color next to it and make it look uncrappy.
That's called being an artist.
The article assumes we all know and understand what beauty is and it's just a matter of getting the right software to attain color-mixing perfection.
I understand that a professional illustrator needs a certain uniformity and predictability to work across platforms -- that is miles from what a non-illustrator artist thinks about.
Bricolage, baby, bricolage.

This has been another installment of Ask Mr. Lo-Fi.

The Weather Channel thinks snowstorms need names! But

The National Weather Service will not be referring to today's Nor'easter as "Athena". They put out this internal directive: "The NWS does not use named winter storms in our products. Please refrain from using the term Athena in any of our products."

Joel Cook (frankhats on dump.fm) made this page:
http://ret.netau.net/chat/icons/listimages.php
...that he had been showing around to a few people. It's an impressive collection of avatar-sized images from every imaginable source, with many dump.fm-centric or -originated examples. The screenshots above and below only give a ghost of a semblance of the page -- many of the icons are animated.

Cook described the project in an email:

Originally I started collecting what I thought could be used as avatars on a web project I was fooling around with (mainly following a tutorial for using pubnub messaging). The idea was to give each new user a random avatar with no username. At the time it was a chat site with nothing hooked up (no history, no system for users, messages just got pushed to any open browser, chaotic), and I was liking the anonymous aspect... but I have moved on to a more fleshed out idea and haven't tried to "finish" the weird hack I was playing with.

Images are not optimized, only forced not to exceed certain dimensions with css. The php script lists every image in the directory and spits it onto the page, and I keep adding to it [1,500 images, 100mb]... There are a few broken images and duplicates probably, oh well.

The term "aggregating" or "image aggregating" has been used to describe this type of creative endeavor, which makes it seem pedestrian and rote rather than carefully chosen and Dadaist. One also might want to avoid the framing of Domenico Quaranta's current curated show at 319 Scholes in Bushwick as the "Internet generation... implementing and developing a practice started in the Sixties by Conceptual Art." Cook's page may have connections to that era through a kind of systematic thinking but otherwise it's something sui generis we're wrestling with here. The "internet generation" doesn't need to be oversold with heavy-handed historicizing based on 1968 precedents. Lastly, compared to Cook's page, Quaranta's favored artists, such as Brad Troemel and Oliver Laric, make work that resembles what you expect internet art to be, as opposed to what it actually is (e.g., vulgar, funny, and beyond the scope of any single artist genius coming out of art school.)

Update: Cook has moved the project to a new URL, as discussed here. [Updated link, 2018]

Strange post-election analysis from Bloomberg News seems to take the theoretical position that we live in a world of signs unconnected to any underlying meaning (emphasis added):

Democrats, too, saw opportunities in Romney’s biography. They spent months and millions of dollars painting him as a corporate raider, happy to ship jobs overseas, and a wealthy man eager to favor his rich friends over a suffering middle class. They had some help from Republican presidential contenders, who had labeled Romney, the co-founder of Bain Capital LLP, a "vulture capitalist" during the primary campaign.

Those attacks, and the ads that contained them, outraged Romney, who complained frequently to advisers, donors and friends that Democrats were wildly misrepresenting his record. Still, his campaign struggled to effectively respond, and the caricature stuck.

Romney himself only reinforced that profile when he told voters in New Hampshire that he “liked to fire people,” NASCAR fans in Florida that he had a lot of friends who were team owners, and supporters in Michigan that his wife owned “a couple of Cadillacs.”

The video leaked from a spring fundraiser in Florida at which Romney uttered the 47 percent remark gave the Obama team the final boost they needed, with Romney’s own words solidifying the profile created by his rivals.

Uh, caricature, profile, painting, label: Romney was in reality all the negatives listed in the first paragraph. An effective campaign simply had to make people aware of it.

Some reactions from folks on dump.fm to my being banned on Paddy Johnson's blog. I was told I was blocked (after being a welcome commenter for years) because my criticisms of Will Brand were making him lose his will to work. (Anonymized)

i find it funny that tom moody of all people has that kind of reputation to the AFC staff - the only really temperate, understanding, kind, patient one left in the whole community

it seems perfectly reasonable to ban someone from a website because they consistently correct your ineptitudes right???

totally, you are nice and patient and they are impulsive/passionate/usually very stupid and the fact that you were upset with them so often made them look bad

tommoody being banned from afc is essentially like china censoring the internet

first they came for tom moody, and i did nothing, bc i wasn't tom moody

next they came for seamonkey

and i said nothing

On Jennifer Chan's terrible article about hiphop, published by Art Fag City without any apparent
editorial oversight:

that article is basically brad troemel-level sophistry, a lot of veiled racism even as she points out the veiled racism and others, and a criticism of a little kid's art

On the wisdom of criticizing Brad Troemel, one of AFC's favored artists:

let's never address what is wrong with what people write because it will give them 'free publicity'