google plus news

Google News was never a great aggregator but it's preferable to, say, the agenda-ridden New York Times for a quick headline-overview. When the Times announced a few years back, for example, that Eliot Spitzer had "ties to organized crime" instead of reporting that he had visited a hooker, with Google News you could see at a glance how other papers were spinning the same factoid.

Lately, though, Google isn't even subtle about using News as recruiting tool for its Facebook-wannabe social media platform, Google Plus. Lambert at the Corrente blog made this screenshot showing how a random dude who happens to have a G+ account has his post mingled into search results with legacy news outlets:

gplusmember_corrente

Another recent change: for stories written by journalists who are G+ members, that correspondent's name appears below the headline with a thumbnail photo and hyperlink to his/her G+ page. There is also a sleekly designed pop-up associated with the hyperlink. Whereas a story written by a non-G+ member has no associated byline (and therefore no link or pop-up) in the search results. Just a little incentive for journalists to join the G+ family.

gplusmember

Google once billed itself as some kind of objective arbiter of web content. Not that any of us believed that, but placing its G+ thumb on the news-gathering scale is not all that different from having internet service providers creating neutrality-defying fast lanes. A minor complaint compared to other egregious practices but worth noting.

Update: As to why the random Google+ user is appearing in search results, the "chief architect of Google+", Yonatan Zunger, responded here. (Hat tip Jules Laplace for following up on this.) The G+ user's post is a comment to the preceding news items, not a news item itself. Perhaps that should have been apparent, because it's indented and put in a box (I see that now, sort of) but Google provides no other warning that it's a random dude comment.
Zunger sidesteps the specific criticism of why a G+ user with nothing to say and very few "pluses" is junking up front page search results. I had suggested it was a rather over-large carrot to entice people to sign up for Google+, which hasn't exactly been setting the world ablaze vis a vis Facebook. Zunger's corporate happy speak position is that Google is "providing people a means to converse about the news" and seeks "to invite them into the discussion." Then why not embed comments from, say, the New York Times? Laplace asked. Google can't do that for "legal and product reasons," Zunger says. OK, sorry you couldn't get that worked out, but aren't you now creating the appearance of giving preferential treatment to your unwashed users at the expense of a credible news source? I'd like to ask -- but he's not going to go there.

adventures in genre fiction

Notes on recent reading:

Fear (1951) and Final Blackout (1940), by L. Ron Hubbard. These pulp-era gems haven't lost their sparkle, especially if you can read them objectively as fiction and not as chapters in the larger story of the creator's life (although they can be approached either way). A project for science fiction studies would be a compare-and-contrast with an unlikely peer, Philip K. Dick. Final Blackout presents an alternate-future story a la Dick's Man in the High Castle, with a libertarian drift. In Dick's book the Germans and Japanese have won World War II and divided the US into eastern and western provinces dominated by the respective victors. In Hubbard's yarn, the US stays out of "the war" while Europe becomes a depopulated wasteland.

Both stories have more on their minds than military what-ifs. Dick revels in the Borgesian play of intersecting parallel worlds and Zen consciousness in his Occupied California, while Hubbard's tough-guy survivor character, The Lieutenant, achieves a kind of agrarian utopia in a UK slowly rebuilding from its ashes. By means of strong leadership, without the corrupt bureaucracy that fueled the war in the first place, the Lieutenant keeps the people busy and happy with reconstruction tasks, never allowing the jobs to harden into permanent organizational structures. He decides to forgo factories and re-industrialization, leading to a new, pleasant England resembling Tolkien's Shire, minus hobbits. Complications arise when the United States shows up with a flotilla of sleek, high-tech warships, saying that it wants to "help" war-ravaged England but actually planning to use it as dumping ground for its own burgeoning population. Hubbard sympathizes with the agrarians despite reverent descriptions of the US's Buck Rogers technology. The author's blueprint for leadership of an unorthodox group is of interest to the modern reader because, well, you know.

It's difficult to talk about Hubbard's other "classic" novella, Fear, without giving too much away. It starts off somewhat similarly to Fritz Lieber's novel Conjure Wife (1940), with a small town college setting and a professor-protagonist who scoffs at the existence of demons and magic. Soon after, step by step, inch by nerve-jangling inch, the main character's ordered life begins to come unraveled. While Lieber's professor eventually pushes back against the occult forces with the help of his wife's superior lore, Hubbard's character ventures deeper into the Dick-ian (or what later became thought of as Dick-ian) territory of a waking nightmare that may or may not be solipsistic.

The Santaroga Barrier (1968), by Frank Herbert. I lost all my Dune paperbacks but still own this book and gave it a re-read recently. A philosophical science fiction horror story, written in the mid-'60s as interest in psychotropic substances was, shall we say, peaking, once again presents us with a dilemma of an unorthodox group. The gripping tale keeps the reader's sympathies ping-ponging back and forth between the small town with enlightened ideals that has a repressive need for consensus and the wider world with messy uncertainties that nonetheless belongs to exploiters and propagandizers. Events don't reach the Waco/Branch Davidian stage but that end game is never far from the current reader's mind. With a minimum of speechmaking, and mostly through the unfolding of its suspense plot, Herbert opposes the idea of large, transcendent, archetypal knowledge not channeled through language -- poetic beauty as seen by the mystics, which sounds like schizophrenic ravings when encountered by outsiders -- and the dull, weaponized language and manipulative metrics employed in TV and marketing. By the end, there is no shortage of doubt regarding the town's methods of preserving its collective innocent honesty.

The Lonely Silver Rain (1985), by John D. MacDonald. The last Travis McGee book meant to introduce a new chapter to the long-running character's saga: "Trav" discovers he has a daughter out of wedlock, who gives him renewed purpose. Henceforth (we're led to believe) he'll be doing his urban detective "salvage" work -- taking 50% of funds he recovers from clients who have been swindled, conning the con men, as it were -- to put money in his daughter's trust, and not just working for his own selfish pleasure. Then the author died, at age 70, leaving the series on a melancholy note despite this 11th hour revelation. Trav does quite a bit of self-lacerating, aided by his mouthy offspring, about his "adolescent" lifestyle. Living on a houseboat, engaging in serial romantic relationships (Trav was too noble to be a mere "womanizer"), enjoying the music collection he recently laboriously converted from vinyl to cassette tape (ah, 1985, when could you be more disastrously wrong in your consumer choices). In the earlier books MacDonald included eloquent justifications that the 9-to-5 life was actually horribly worse -- this being the same regimented and materialistic America that disgusted the town of Santaroga and menaced Hubbard's Lieutenant -- but there's none of that here. Unquestionably the series presented escapist fare for the deskbound, steeped in assumptions of the Mad Men era, but surely there was a way to evolve the character without indicting, as mere immaturity, the reader's dreams of leaving the rat race.

circular jets

circularjets_BW_depop

Hat tip Sucrete for the found science GIF chopped up by yrs truly to make the above puffy mandala. These amoebas or smoke rings assume laboratory conditions of idealized gravitational and atmospheric stability, making this GIF fall somewhere among art, science and sublime thought experiment.

piet de resistance

hw2-anim-11

More on the conventional wisdom especially rife among computer programmers that anyone can make a Mondrian. Hat tip Jeffrey Henderson for a link to Piet, an abstract art generating language from an Australian programmer, David Morgan-Mar.
Making a web-friendly "Mondrian," in my opinion, is one of the dumber, more cliched things you could ever want to do, but Morgan-Mar's example page of various geeks' efforts isn't all "Mondrians" -- there is some nice pixel art-y stuff (see example above). Using machines to make art isn't inherently bad but the process should perhaps develop its own way, not as recreations of beginner textbook Modernism.

see also

Update: Jules Laplace emails: "Slight correction.. Piet is not really an 'abstract art generating language' so much as an esoteric, 2-dimensional programming language where color encodes signal flow. It no more generates abstract art than Befunge, a similar language, generates ASCII art -- although the author states his intent to produce an interpretable language which is also decorative."

My reply: I was paraphrasing the Piet author's sentence - "Piet is a programming language in which programs look like abstract paintings." The word "generate" is perhaps inappropriate if the code is itself the image. (But something gave birth to the image, right?) My rant was aimed more at the results of the code, or coding. A scientist I know hates it when artists use the word "experiment" and I hate it equally when someone accidentally stumbles on a pleasing pattern and says "hey! I'm kind of a good abstract artist!"

the generator and the flowers

mond_generator

None of Mondrian's paintings done in the "mature" late style were landscape orientation (all were portrait, square or diamond) so the true shitty mondrian generator would want to start there.

The "maturity" of that late work got me thinking about Mondrian's flower paintings and drawings, which he continued doing while he was making the primary colored rectangles. Legend has it he made these as his bread and butter since the rectangles weren't selling. I have always perversely wanted to see a retrospective that hung the artist's works in strict chronological order, to explode the myth of his development as a Modernist. (Suffice it to say the last one I saw at MOMA didn't do that.)
Even accomplishing that would be tricky, because many of the flowers aren't dated, or were clumsily back-dated by the artist to preserve the myth of his abandonment of naturalism.

While pondering this I found an obsessive Mondrian fetish site that has scans of all the flowers and all the late paintings grouped by color. Caution, this site is waa-a-ay pre-social media, with Comic Sans lettering and crisp HTML borders floating over a hideous textured yellow background.