Archive for February, 2011
hat tip CPB, who has a link back to the original site. I'm gathering this is about how idealistic groups of newsgroup users coped with the rising tide of email spam from 1995-2004. Rules, codes, and such. Am thinking more about usenet these days (and other forms of low bandwidth communication) as the WWW gradually succumbs to Telco spam in the form of webcast sports events, bad movies, AOL-like social media sites, etc.
(TFS stands for True Free Speech--just imagine)
"New Scratch Model" [2.9 MB .mp3]
The Scratch School is back, with a short classical style composition.
Commented in Paddy's discussion of vanished reblog archives: it's not just "preserving the database" but tracking changes to post URLs & CSS.
...Rhizome has changed several times the way posts are organized and named --when you go from, say, a numbered post to having the word "reblog" in the url to removing the word "reblog" and assigning a content tag "reblog" to those old posts, links break and commands to "redirect" to the old links have to be written. You could go post by post and do this but usually programmers try to find a way to automate the process, so inevitably content gets lost. It's still in the database, but invisible to anyone using the site. Also, sites change their CSS design and information specific to the original post is lost that way, too. (E.g., removing a date stamp or a comment link by making it invisible in the CSS script.) Eventually you end up needing massive detective work to find posts (using Google's cache, other blogs, etc) and can never fully reconstruct a site as readers originally saw it.
Made belated response to commenter's "formalist net art about itself" in Paddy's "clubs to affinity" discussion.
...the surf club activities described in the Marcin Ramocki essay linked to above don't really constitute "formalist net art about itself," anymore than the science of linguistics is only concerned with the interplay of signs. There is always a connection to, and a concern about, the world these signs represent. When a web 2.0 artist talks, jokes, or makes art about art (or politiics or science) expressed in internet terms--i.e., reduced to jpegs and YouTubes--a comparison to the underlying "signifieds" of physical reality and history--their original meanings--is usually part of the equation. Not always, but with the better work.
hat tips lolumad and marisa
Matt Stoller, former Open Left blogger and assistant to the recently (sadly) deposed Rep. Alan Grayson, has been writing for Yves Smith's blog Naked Capitalism. He ties together Egypt and Wisconsin through the connecting thread of organized labor resistance to neoliberal "tough love" scenarios (not the Facebook revolution, sorry).
Beneath the smiley face of the neolibs lurks this scary quote about "liquidation" from Herbert Hoover's Treasury Secretary.
Update: The case against neoliberalism, from an Egyptian writer.
hat tips frankhats and gridworks1
hat tips carjackcker and GucciSoFlosy
source (sort of)
hat tip stage
A few months ago was having a conversation about the '60s and someone said "but it was really only Andy Warhol who marketed himself both in the fine art and commercial realms." I said no, many more got bit by the bug, even Donald Judd, who appeared in Harper's Bazaar posing with a woman wearing a "minimalist dress" (his wife at the time, dancer Julie Finch) and famously sold "art furniture." Found the pic in question on the, um, internet: look and weep, all you who might think Judd was a stern mandarin figure aloof from the process of mass media promotion, alone in the studio with only a T-square for company. Here he is, "workin' it." (The green stripe is a scanning error, not art.)
hat tips Bill Schwarz and James Meyer